Comments on: Vigilante public transportation http://www.munidiaries.com/2009/04/07/vigilante-public-transportation/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=vigilante-public-transportation Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:39:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: megan allison http://www.munidiaries.com/2009/04/07/vigilante-public-transportation/comment-page-1/#comment-2019 megan allison Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:59:24 +0000 http://www.munidiaries.com/?p=2341#comment-2019 Actually it's not just the F that dude is stomping on, it's taxi drivers. It is super illegal in the city of San Francisco for limo drivers to solicit rides off the street in that way (in the city or at the airport) and they are taking business directly away from licensed San Francisco taxicabs. Limousines are supposed to pre-arrange rides with written or oral contracts (at any time an SFPD officer can ask them to provide proof of this per Article 16 of the SF Police Code) and because of this they are able to realize much more revenue per ride than a taxi, which is legally limited to charging the municipal rates on the taximeter. The legal limo/taxi differential exists because theoretically there are two different transportation needs being met; taxis are a form of public transportation serving a more ad-hoc need, and limousines charge a premium for a contractual, personalized ride in an unmarked vehicle without as much focus on time and distance. When a limo skirts this regulation to fill unbooked time, they take money right out of cab drivers' pockets. Cab drivers are already screwed enough by the city; prevented from labor organizing by their bogus "independent contractor" status and often driving years without any possibility of an ownership stake in the industry, and it will only get worse as the city looks to squeeze budget dollars out of the cab industry by revoking our longtime public policy of taxi medallions as essentially public property. If you ever see a limo driver soliciting rides on the street or at the airport, please tell him what he's doing is illegal and in violation of the Police Code. Better yet, call the SFPD's taxi detail at (415) 553-1447 and report his license plate number. Actually it’s not just the F that dude is stomping on, it’s taxi drivers.

It is super illegal in the city of San Francisco for limo drivers to solicit rides off the street in that way (in the city or at the airport) and they are taking business directly away from licensed San Francisco taxicabs. Limousines are supposed to pre-arrange rides with written or oral contracts (at any time an SFPD officer can ask them to provide proof of this per Article 16 of the SF Police Code) and because of this they are able to realize much more revenue per ride than a taxi, which is legally limited to charging the municipal rates on the taximeter.

The legal limo/taxi differential exists because theoretically there are two different transportation needs being met; taxis are a form of public transportation serving a more ad-hoc need, and limousines charge a premium for a contractual, personalized ride in an unmarked vehicle without as much focus on time and distance. When a limo skirts this regulation to fill unbooked time, they take money right out of cab drivers’ pockets. Cab drivers are already screwed enough by the city; prevented from labor organizing by their bogus “independent contractor” status and often driving years without any possibility of an ownership stake in the industry, and it will only get worse as the city looks to squeeze budget dollars out of the cab industry by revoking our longtime public policy of taxi medallions as essentially public property.

If you ever see a limo driver soliciting rides on the street or at the airport, please tell him what he’s doing is illegal and in violation of the Police Code. Better yet, call the SFPD’s taxi detail at (415) 553-1447 and report his license plate number.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Tara http://www.munidiaries.com/2009/04/07/vigilante-public-transportation/comment-page-1/#comment-2016 Tara Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:41:15 +0000 http://www.munidiaries.com/?p=2341#comment-2016 Oh, well now that's just heartbreaking. I'm not being sarcastic either, the idea of the poor little F-cars sleeping in the muckymuck is awful. I hope for a brand-new car barn for them soon. Oh, well now that’s just heartbreaking. I’m not being sarcastic either, the idea of the poor little F-cars sleeping in the muckymuck is awful. I hope for a brand-new car barn for them soon.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Jamison Wieser http://www.munidiaries.com/2009/04/07/vigilante-public-transportation/comment-page-1/#comment-2014 Jamison Wieser Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:21:08 +0000 http://www.munidiaries.com/?p=2341#comment-2014 Our poor F-Line. That series of rainstorms we had last month were hard on the F-Line streetcars, and until the new car barn is finished next year, they sleep outdoors at night and many of them started leaking. With the better weather we should be seeing less bustitution and more streetcars. Our poor F-Line. That series of rainstorms we had last month were hard on the F-Line streetcars, and until the new car barn is finished next year, they sleep outdoors at night and many of them started leaking. With the better weather we should be seeing less bustitution and more streetcars.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

]]>