From a West Portal resident: ‘Wrong Solution to Saturday’s Tragedy’
Media attention has turned to the manual controls of the Muni trains in the West Portal accident. We received the following email from rider and West Portal resident Mark:
Let me first say that my heart goes out to all of those who were injured Saturday afternoon in the Muni accident at West Portal. That said, I feel like it is necessary to speak my mind on what happened because I feel that I have a unique opinion which I have not yet seen expressed by anyone in the media.
As of Monday, the media has finally drawn its attention to the procedure of taking trains off control of the ATC [editor's note: Automatic Train Control] prior to entering West Portal Station. As a long-time resident of the West Portal area, I know that this has been going on almost ever since the ATC went online; any regular Muni patron knows this as well. If there is no train currently in the station, the ATC brings the train in. If there is already a train in the station, especially if it’s only a one-car train, as it was on Saturday, once the ATC has stopped the train outside of the station, drivers usually switch off the computer and take the train in manually so two trains can load/unload at the same time. This is a very efficient procedure because West Portal is both a bottleneck inbound and outbound, as only one train can enter/exit at a time, so often during commute hours trains will be waiting to enter/exit West Portal Station. By allowing the driver to bring in the train in manual mode, the driver takes full advantage of the three-car length platform and speeds things up a bit, which in my experience makes a big difference.
While it is true that if the train were left on the computer Saturday afternoon the crash would not have occurred, one must differentiate between the cause of the accident and something that merely would have prevented it from occurring. The accident was not caused by the train being taken off ATC early, but of, what looks like at this point, some sort of a medical condition experienced by the driver of the train. Absent a “blackout” (or with proper attention), the driver could have stopped the train, which is why this procedure has not been a problem for all of these years. Had the driver “blacked out” five minutes later while driving on the street, he might have driven the L train onto 19th Avenue, possibly causing a multi-car pile up which could have resulted in multiple fatalities. What occurred on Saturday afternoon was an accident. It was not due to a mechanical failure of the train nor to the well recognized procedure of taking trains off automatic control early to expedite service at West Portal. It is absolutely horrible what happened, but not allowing trains to be driven manually into the station behind another train is only going to make a mere 100 feet of the system safer, and will result in significant bottlenecks during the morning and afternoon commutes.
Prior to the implementation of the ATC, trains were always driven manually in the tunnel and drivers are trained to be able to do so. Unfortunately, accidents will occur and that’s what this was… an accident (or else incompetence). One needs to realize this before they automatically start pointing the finger at Muni. Ending this longstanding procedure is only a “feel good” measure, a false security that makes people believe that something has been done, but unfortunately accidents do and will occur. You can’t look back on a terrible event and say, “if only this” or “if only that”. Unfortunately, every once in a while, something like this happens.
Muni Diaries is a place to share all things Muni-related.
Related posts:
- Light-rail vehicles collide at West Portal, dozens injured (w/updates + video)
- Muni’s new insurance policy — too late to cover this weekend’s West Portal crash? (update)
- Derailment on the L-Taraval near West Portal
Written by: eugenia

good post but I for one for one do not blame ATC or the process of using/not using it. I blame the union that hired and kept this guy. how many people have to die so that we can protect lifetime employment of our incompetent employees?
[Reply]
Mark Reply:
July 21st, 2009 at 9:59 am
Agreed, unfortunately that’s not the solution they’re looking into at this point.
[Reply]
Cub_Oski Reply:
July 21st, 2009 at 2:16 pm
That guy been a driver for 30 years. It looks like he feel ill. If muni give the drivers breaks and not have the drivers in the seat for 8+ hrs something like this could have been prevented.
[Reply]
Aaron Reply:
July 21st, 2009 at 2:36 pm
I was talking to one of the Metro operators today and he said that the operator who caused the crash is one of the best in the system. Like it was mentioned he had been a driver for 30 years and has an almost impeccable safety record. Please do not call him “incompetent” because he suffered a medical condition. Of course the facts are not out yet, but from the sounds of it he passed out because of a medical problem not because he was tired from sitting for 8 hours a day!
[Reply]
Cub_Oski Reply:
July 21st, 2009 at 3:25 pm
I’m not saying it’s from sitting for 8 hours. I’m saying is he passed out because maybe his sugar was low or somthing like that. If muni give the drivers a few minutes to get something to eat or take a break from work like we all do then maybe something like these won’t happen.
[Reply]
james Reply:
July 21st, 2009 at 9:46 pm
i don’t care. pilots are disqualified from flying if they test positive for diabetes.
so should public transit operators. i care more about you and your safety than these
guys right to be a ticking time bomb behind the wheel.
[Reply]
Finally some sane and thoughtful comments. As usual, the media and authorities are looking for an easy way out, neither accepting that accidents just happen as part of life and sometime no one is to blame, nor looking to fix the real problems. It is so much easier to implement some new “strict” rules, never mind the consequences.
[Reply]
The media is confusing causes with prevention. They should be doing more research (and learning how to write better so as to not jump to conclusions like they are) instead of just reporting whatever they hear. This just shows their ignorance of MUNI, making them unqualified to be reporting on it. This also further proves that you have to take whatever they say with a grain of salt.
I also disagree with the NTSB stepping in. First of all, they know nothing of MUNI and come from a city that doesn’t know shit about public transportation and would die in their car before they would step foot on a train or bus. And secondly, the government is just providing a false sense of security. They want the people to feel that they are keeping them safe. When it comes to things like people’s health (i.e., air quality, various chemicals used in food and other everyday products which are known to cause cancer etc.) they won’t step in because it will “hurt business”. When the federal government starts to protect people in the long term instead of pretending to protect them from the big bad trains, then I’ll listen. For now, get out of San Francisco.
[Reply]
Alex Reply:
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:37 am
The NTSB knows a thing or two about public transportation. It’s the California PUC you should be irritated with. The CPUC runs its safety inspection every few years, and never finds any problems with MUNI. The NTSB folks will at least call it like it is. If the MTA, CPUC, or some other local agency were qualified to oversee the investigation, they would.
https://ntsb.gov/recs/letters/1997/R97_47.pdf
This was about ten years ago, but here’s a choice quote:
“[NTSB] Safety Board discussions with the CPUC uncovered a lack of urgency in the [CPUC] commission’s efforts to address the recurring accidents on MUNI. Indeed, the CPUC intended to give priority in its safety audits to other fixed guideway systems that had not experienced the level of accidents that MUNI had. In light of the high number of accidents on MUNI since December 1996, the Safety Board is concerned that the CPUC has not taken the initiative to immediately conduct a safety audit of the [MUNI] system.”
In short the CPUC has tried to assert that they are the appropriate regulatory body to oversee MUNI. To noone’s surprise they don’t really do much. Unfortunately the NTSB only has the resources to investigate roughly a dozen accidents a year, and can’t solely focus on the inteptitude at MUNI.
P.S. My captcha is “351 disgust”. Heh.
[Reply]
i was one of the injured on this muni accident, and honestly, after all is said and done, yes, the driver had a medical condition and passed out. not his fault. not munis fault. fine. i for one feel that rather than arriving at my destination a few minutes early i would choose my safety and life. so im sorry if i STILL think it is ridiculous for everyone to look the other way while the muni drivers impliment a practice that is so blatently against regulations.
put yourself into the situation and then see how you feel about all of this, i thinks its easy to come up with a rational, but ridiculous thought, when you are not the one who has been hurt.
[Reply]
Alex Reply:
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:29 am
As stated above, diabetes is reason to pull a pilot’s license. If the driver is morbidly obese (check the pictures) and doesn’t have his diabetes (again look at the picture) under control, he’s got no business driving a public transportation vehicle.
Keep in mind MUNI drivers came to the defense of Mr. Bradley Bradley, he was one of the good one. It was just a fluke that he happened to be texting and speeding when he ran his train into a stopped one on 3rd St.
Taking the train out of auto mode is hardly as terrible as you’re talking it up to be. Think about it for a moment. If this wreck had occurred five minutes later, the train would have been legitimately in manual “street” mode and the consequences perhaps far higher. If it’s unsafe for this driver to operate a train manually in a tunnel, on a dedicated right of way, with only LRVs going in the SAME direction to contend with… how on earth would it be safe for this driver to operate his vehicle on the street in a shared right of way with pedestrians, automobiles (some going the wrong way) to contend with?
[Reply]
here’s some background on what it takes to get faa approval to still fly with a diagnosed diabetes condition. good info on how prevalent this disease is in our society too.
http://www.pilotfriend.com/aeromed/medical/diabetes.htm
[Reply]
It is safe for Muni drivers to go manual, they are trained to drive the trains. Let’s not overreact.
[Reply]
james Reply:
July 23rd, 2009 at 1:45 pm
i don’t have a problem with manual. that is what they are paid to do. i have a problem with a driver blacking out. get him out of any job that endangers the public or himself, asap!
[Reply]